|
Smart Cams Said To Be Able To Spot Criminals By How They Walk
|
|
CHINA TO
SHARE IN U.S. FIRM'S FACE-READING TECHNOLOGY Dee Ann Divis UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL ----------------------------------------------------------- The company that supplied controversial face-recognition technology to scan people on the streets of Tampa, Fla., is working with commercial partners in China to supply the same technology there. Face-recognition software analyzes the spaces and angles of as many as 80 key points on a person's face. Data from only 14 to 20 such points are enough to create a unique digital "face print" that can then be compared with an existing database of face prints, derived, for example, from pictures of wanted criminals. When used with surveillance cameras, the monitoring system can scan the faces in a store, on a street or at a sporting event for those wanted by the police. Such a system was used at this year's Super Bowl to scan for criminals and possible terrorists. Tampa has since used the system in a popular nightlife district. Joseph Atick, chairman and CEO of Visionics Corp. and an inventor of face-recognition technology, told reporters Wednesday that his company is doing business in roughly 50 to 60 nations, including China. One application being considered for China is access control, he said, citing banking as an example. One's face becomes one's password, which could be especially useful where not all account holders are literate. There was no technology transfer involved in the Chinese transactions, Mr. Atick said. "They buy basically a finished product from us, just like they would buy a piece of equipment and integrate it into their applications," he said. The company would not sell to Iraq, Libya or Iran, Mr. Atick said. The revelation about the possible sale of such systems to China came during a news conference sponsored by the Security Industry Association. The face-recognition system has been used in Mexico to prevent voter fraud. In Newham, a neighborhood in London, incidents of crime have dropped by 40 percent since the system was installed two years ago, Mr. Atick said. Privacy advocates in the United States have raised alarms over face recognition and other surveillance systems, such as closed-circuit television. The industry association is calling for a refocusing on developing policies to govern the responsible use of face-recognition and closed-circuit television. SIA would prefer voluntary rules and distributed internally developed guidelines on the use of closed-circuit television. The document suggested it be used only for public safety and law enforcement, and not be used for monitoring programs based on race, sex, national origin, sexual orientation or disability. It also suggested that public systems be set up to see only what a police officer on site would see and that tapes be erased after an appropriate amount of time. Not everyone is convinced of the usefulness of such guidelines. There are guidelines against spying, giving out classified information and rifling Internal Revenue Service records -- which have not stopped abuses, said Richard Diamond, spokesman for House Majority Leader Dick Armey, Texas Republican, who has come out strongly against surveillance technologies. Industry representatives countered that such technologies aid police in their duties and could help stop identity theft. They also asserted that such monitoring in public places does not infringe on protections against unreasonable search and seizure because courts have ruled there is no expectation of privacy in the public places where such systems are used. ["I think the industry's getting very nervous," Marc Rottenber, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told Reuters news agency. "I rather suspect the stuff they're emphasizing, a lot of that is to protect business interests."] Though no law appears to ban closed-circuit television or face recognition, regulation may indeed be on the horizon. Hearings are planned for when Congress returns in September, Mr. Diamond said. "The point is this technology is too powerful and too open to abuse, and guidelines aren't going to fix that problem," he said. |
|
You may be spied on
- for Australia's wellbeing March 7, 2002 |
|
Net Monitoring Scheme Under Fire
BBC NEWS |
|
Guess Who's Tracking You By
Cell Phone? By Ben Charny Special to ZDNet News February 27, 2002, 3:00 PM PT The nation's cell phone service providers will soon know exactly where every one of their customers is, at all times, and privacy rights groups are asking what they plan to do with the information. All U.S. carriers are under Federal Communications Commission orders to make it possible for police to locate cell phones calling 911, something police can't do now. Carriers plan to use the same systems to sell services like helping stranded motorists even if they don't know their location, or finding the closest restaurant. Because people with cell phone generally always carry their phone with them, the FCC regulations give the thriving market for personal information something its never had a chance to get: the exact locations at all times of more than 140 million people. "There are some things you don't mind other people knowing, but your location isn't one of them," said Gary Laden, a privacy program director for BBBOnline, a Better Business Bureau subsidiary. Private details that become public knowledge every time people visit Web pages and leave information, every address that the U.S. government sells, or every ATM transaction that dutifully records the time are just some of the ways that technology has been tracking individuals. But knowing someone's location at all times adds a significant new twist to tracking information about people. Sprint is already offering an Enhanced 911 (E911) system in Rhode Island and sells a pair of phones that work on the system. In a year, Verizon Wireless says nearly half of all new handsets activated will have this capability. The FCC expects 95 percent of the cell phones sold in the United States by 2005 will meet the FCC guidelines. Neither AT&T Wireless nor Verizon Wireless offer any E911 or related services yet. But both say they do not sell the information they already collect from their subscribers, such as a home address used to send a monthly bill. And they don't plan to do anything different with the location information once they do offer those services. "We already know where you live, but we haven't made that available to anyone," Verizon Wireless representative Nancy Stark said. Travis Larson, a spokesman for the wireless trade group Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association said the worry isn't so much the carriers, but the independent companies that provide the commercial services. "Not all companies in this space will be CTIA members," he said. "Then you have a group of businesses unregulated." So far, backers of two consumer privacy initiatives say they've begun talks with carriers about what they plan to do with the information they collect. On Wednesday, AT&T Wireless spokesman Ritch Blasi said the company is the first U.S. carrier to have its privacy policies reviewed and approved by Truste, a coalition that approves online privacy policies, whose sponsors include AT&T Wireless, AOL Time Warner, Intel, Microsoft and others. Truste and AT&T Wireless are also working together to create a uniform policy for what carriers should do with the information they collect. Blasi and a spokesman for Truste said they want carriers to tell subscribers that their location can be tracked, and what plans, if any, they have for the information. Also Wednesday, supporters of a recently approved privacy standard known as P3P (Platform for Privacy Preferences) say they've also begun a dialogue with wireless carriers. Some versions of Microsoft's Internet Explorer use P3P to automate the process of deciding if a Web site's privacy policies are good enough for a user. People can pre-load their Web browsers with preferences, such as whether they want a Web site to accept a browser's cookies filled with personal information. If the browser is directed toward a Web page, it'll seek out the privacy policies and determine if they match the preferred ones. If not, the Web page doesn't load. Josh Freed, a spokesman for the Internet Education Foundation, said backers of P3P want to offer the same type of function to cell phone customers. "This way, every time there is an exchange of data, the phone alerts you if there is a conflict," he said. The effort is very new, Freed and others warn, and is preceding even the existing technology. "We have a blank page in front of us now," said J. Walter Hyer, AT&T Wireless chief privacy officer. |
|
U.S. to Weigh Computer Chip
Implant
Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2002 AP WASHINGTON (AP) - A Florida technology company is poised to ask the government for permission to market a first-ever computer ID chip that could be embedded beneath a person's skin.
For airports, nuclear power plants and other high security facilities, the immediate benefits could be a closer-to-foolproof security system. But privacy advocates warn the chip could lead to encroachments on civil liberties. The implant technology is another case of science fiction evolving into fact. Those who have long advanced the idea of implant chips say it could someday mean no more easy-to-counterfeit ID cards nor dozing security guards. Just a computer chip - about the size of a grain of rice - that would be difficult to remove and tough to mimic. Other uses of the technology on the horizon, from an added device that would allow satellite tracking of an individual's every movement to the storage of sensitive data like medical records, are already attracting interest across the globe for tasks like foiling kidnappings or assisting paramedics. Applied Digital Solutions' new ``VeriChip'' is another sign that Sept. 11 has catapulted the science of security into a realm with uncharted possibilities - and also new fears for privacy. ``The problem is that you always have to think about what the device will be used for tomorrow,'' said Lee Tien, a senior attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy advocacy group. ``It's what we call function creep. At first a device is used for applications we all agree are good but then it slowly is used for more than it was intended,'' he said. Applied Digital, based in Palm Beach, Fla., says it will soon begin the process of getting Food and Drug Administration approval for the device, and intends to limit its marketing to companies that ensure its human use is voluntary. ``The line in the sand that we draw is that the use of the VeriChip would always be voluntarily,'' said Keith Bolton, chief technology officer and a vice president at Applied Digital. ``We would never provide it to a company that intended to coerce people to use it.'' More than a decade ago, Applied bought a competing firm, Destron Fearing, which had been making chips implanted in animals for several years. Those chips were mainly bought by animal owners wanting to provide another way for pound workers to identify a lost pet. Chips for humans aren't that much different. But the company was hesitant to market them for people because of ethical questions. The devastation of Sept. 11 solidified the company's resolve to market the human chip and brought about a new sensibility about the possible interest. ``It's a sad time ... when people have to wonder whether it's safe in their own country,'' Bolton said. The makers of the chip also foresee it being used to help emergency workers diagnose a lost Alzheimer's patient or access an unconscious patient's medical history. Getting the implant would go something like this: A person or company buys the chip from Applied Digital for about $200 and the company encodes it with the desired information. The person seeking the implant takes the tiny device - about the size of a grain of rice, to their doctor, who can insert it with a large needle device. The doctor monitors the device for several weeks to make sure it doesn't move and that no infection develops. The device has no power supply, rather it contains a millimeter-long magnetic coil that is activated when a scanning device is run across the skin above it. A tiny transmitter on the chip sends out the data. Without a scanner, the chip cannot be read. Applied Digital plans to give away chip readers to hospitals and ambulance companies, in the hopes they'll become standard equipment. The chip has drawn attention from several religious groups. Theologian and author Terry Cook said he worries the identification chip could be the ``mark of the beast,'' an identifying mark that all people will be forced to wear just before the end times, according to the Bible. Applied Digital has consulted theologians and appeared on the religious television program the ``700 Club'' to assure viewers the chip didn't fit the biblical description of the mark because it is under the skin and hidden from view. Even with the privacy and religious concerns, some are already eager to use the product. Jeff Jacobs in Coral Springs, Florida has contacted the company in hopes of becoming the first person to purchase the chip. Jacobs suffers from a number of serious allergies and wants to make sure medical personnel can diagnose him. ``They would know who to contact, they would know what medications I'm on, and it's quite a few,'' he said. ``They would know what I'm allergic to, what kind of operations I've had and where there might be problems.'' Applied Digital says technology to let the chip to be used for tracking is already well under development. Eight Latin American companies have contacted Applied Digital and have openly encouraged the company to pursue the internal tracking devices. In some countries, kidnapping has become an epidemic that limits tourism and business. |
|